Mock server for testing

ABSTRACT

Systems of the present disclosure provide a versatile, reusable mock server to respond to Application-Programming-Interface (API) requests. The mock server receives an API request and a cookie associated with the API request. The API server identifies response instructions found in the cookie. The response instructions may include a static response value, a name of an API server for the mock server to imitate, or code for the mock server to execute in the process of generating a mock API response. The mock server generates a mock API response based on the response instructions and sends the mock API response in reply to the API request.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This Application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 16/112,485, filed Aug. 24, 2018, now U.S. patent Ser. No.10/657,038, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.15/411,779, filed Jan. 20, 2017, now U.S. patent Ser. No. 10/089,219,the contents of each of which are incorporated herein in their entirety.

BACKGROUND Field

Embodiments presented herein generally relate to mock server systems.More specifically, techniques are disclosed for a mock server thatresponds to API calls.

Related Art

Application programming interfaces (APIs) generally expose variousroutines and methods to software developers for use in obtaining andmodifying data using features of a software application. These APIs maybe accessible programmatically (e.g., as function calls programmed in anapplication or function library) or via a web resource for web-basedapplications. Web-based applications can invoke functionality exposed byan API, for example, using a Representational State Transfer functioncall (a REST call), queries in an HTTP POST request, a Simple ObjectAccess Protocol (SOAP) request, or other protocols that allow clientsoftware to invoke functions on a remote system.

Programmers often write code that integrates with other components viaAPIs. During the development process, however, these components may notyet be available or may be unsuitable for testing use for other reasons.Therefore, software development teams sometimes set up mock servers tosimulate external API components. Developers can configure a mock APIservice to respond to API requests in a way that simulates an actual APIservice. Furthermore, developers can configure the mock API service tofacilitate testing. For example, developers can include “stubs” in themock API service that define how the mock API service should respond toAPI requests that meet specified criteria.

SUMMARY

One embodiment of the present disclosure includes a method for a mockserver to respond to Application-Programming-Interface (API) requests.The method generally includes receiving, at the mock server, an APIrequest and one or more cookies associated with the API request; parsingthe one or more cookies to identify response instructions; generating amock API response based on the response instructions; and sending themock API response in reply to the API request.

Another embodiment provides a computer-readable storage medium havinginstructions, which, when executed on a processor, perform an operationfor a mock server to respond to Application-Programming-Interface (API)requests. The operation generally includes receiving, at the mockserver, an API request and one or more cookies associated with the APIrequest; parsing the one or more cookies to identify responseinstructions; generating a mock API response based on the responseinstructions; and sending the mock API response in reply to the APIrequest.

Still another embodiment of the present disclosure includes a processorand a memory storing a program which, when executed on the processor,performs an operation for a mock server to respond toApplication-Programming-Interface (API) requests. The operationgenerally includes receiving, at the mock server, an API request and oneor more cookies associated with the API request; parsing the one or morecookies to identify response instructions; generating a mock APIresponse based on the response instructions; and sending the mock APIresponse in reply to the API request.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a computing network environment wherein technology ofthe present disclosure can operate, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 2 illustrates a detailed view of a mock service, according to oneembodiment.

FIG. 3A illustrates a cookie that includes response instructionsincluding a static value to return in a mock API response, according toone embodiment.

FIG. 3B illustrates a cookie that includes response instructionsspecifying a proxy host to mimic, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 3C illustrates a cookie that includes response instructionsspecifying Java code to execute, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 4 illustrates a method for generating a response to an API requestat a mock server, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 5 illustrates a method for testing functionality of front-end codefor a web application, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 6 illustrates an API mocking system that mocks API servers based onresponse instructions included in cookies, according to an embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Existing mock API servers have some disadvantages. For example, settingup a mock API server that meets the needs of a given project takes time.In particular, if the developers want the mock server to execute codefor a compiled language (e.g., Java or C++) as part of the process ofgenerating an API response, the developers have to write and debugextensions for this purpose. Furthermore, two development teamstypically cannot share a mock server because the teams may need the mockserver to behave in contradictory ways under identical circumstances.For example, one team may want the mock server to return a status of“500” (indicating an internal error) for a request matching a condition,while the other team may want the mock server to return a status of“202” (indicating the request was accepted) for a request matching thesame condition. For similar reasons, mock servers typically cannot bereused for different projects.

Embodiments presented herein provide techniques for a mock server torespond to Application-Programming-Interface (API) requests withoutdepending on stubs or code stored at the mock server. Rather, the mockserver determines how to respond to an API request by readinginformation included in a cookie (or multiple cookies). The cookie isstored in a browser at a client computing device. The client computingdevice sends the cookie to the mock server along with the API request.Since the response from the mock server determines the response based oninformation in the cookie instead of information stored at the mockserver, a developer on the client side can ensure the mock serverreturns a desired response to an API request by editing the cookie atthe client computing device. Hence, there is no need to manipulatesettings or code at the mock server when the developer wants the mockserver to return a different response to the API request. In oneembodiment, a mock server receives an API request and a cookie. The APIserver identifies instructions in the cookie. The instructions mayinclude a static response value, identify an API server for the mockserver to imitate, or include code for the mock server to execute togenerate a response. The mock server generates a response based on theresponse instructions and sends the response in reply to the APIrequest.

By using cookies to determine how to respond to API request, a mock APIservice can be used by multiple development teams—even if those teamswant the mock API service to return different responses to identical APIrequests. Furthermore, embodiments of the present disclosure provide amock API service that can be reused without requiring configurationchanges.

For example, suppose a first user wants to test how a front-endapplication will react if an HTTP status of 200 is received in reply toan API request. The first user writes a stub specifying a mock server isto return an HTTP status of 200 for the API request and URL-encodes thestub in a first cookie. The first cookie is sent with the API request tothe mock server. The mock server parses the first cookie and returns theHTTP status of 200 as requested in the first cookie.

Also suppose a second user wants to test how a front-end applicationwill react if an HTTP status of 204 is received in reply to an identicalAPI request. The second user writes a stub specifying a mock server isto return an HTTP status of 204 for the API request and URL-encodes thestub in a second cookie. The second cookie is sent with the API requestto the mock server. The mock server parses the second cookie and returnsthe HTTP status of 204 as requested in the second cookie.

In another example, suppose a first user wants the mock server toimitate a first API server when responding to an API request. The firstuser specifies the first API server in a first cookie. The first cookieis sent with the API request to the mock server. The mock server parsesthe first cookie, forwards the API request to the first API server,receives a response from the first API server, and sends the response inreply to the API request as requested in the first cookie.

Also suppose a second user wants the mock server to imitate a second APIserver when responding to an identical API request. The second userspecifies the second API server in a second cookie. The second cookie issent with the API request to the mock server. The mock server parses thesecond cookie, forwards the API request to the second API server,receives a response from the second API server, and sends the responsein reply to the API request as requested in the second cookie.

In another example, suppose a first user wants the mock server to waitfor three seconds before returning a response to an API request. Thefirst user includes Java code instructing the mock server to sleep forthree seconds in a first cookie. The first cookie is sent with the APIrequest to the mock server. The mock server parses the first cookie andexecutes the code. After waiting three seconds as specified in the code,the mock server sends a response to the API request (e.g., based onother instructions in the cookie).

Also suppose a second user wants the mock server to wait for fiveseconds before returning a response to an identical API request. Thesecond user includes Java code instructing the mock server to sleep forfive seconds in a second cookie. The second cookie is sent with the APIrequest to the mock server. The mock server parses the second cookie andexecutes the code. After waiting five seconds as specified in the code,the mock server sends a response to the API request (e.g., based onother instructions in the cookie).

FIG. 1 illustrates a computing network environment 100 whereintechnology of the present disclosure can operate, according to oneembodiment. As shown, the environment 100 includes a computing device106, an application programming interface (API) server 104, and a mockserver 114. The API server 104 provides web API service 108. The web APIservice 108 can receive an API request from the front-end application111 (e.g., for a web application) executing in the browser 110. The webAPI service 108 determines an appropriate API response to the APIrequest and sends the API response to the browser 110. Upon receivingthe API response, the browser 110 continues executing the front-endapplication 111.

Suppose a developer wants to test how the front-end application 111behaves when a specific type of API response is received in reply to anAPI request. In one embodiment, the front-end application 111 sends anAPI request to the mock server 114 instead of the API server 104 fortesting purposes. The browser 110 also sends the cookie 112 with the APIrequest to the mock server 114. The cookie 112 includes responseinstructions 113. The mock service 109 generates a mock API response tothe API request based on the response instructions 113. The responseinstructions 113 may indicate how the mock service 109 is to behave inresponse to the API request and how the mock service 109 is to generatethe mock API response in a number of ways.

In one example, the response instructions 113 include a stub thatspecifies a static value for the mock service 109 to return as the mockAPI response in reply to the API request. The stub, including the staticvalue, may be Uniform-Resource-Locator (URL) encoded.

In another example, the response instructions 113 specify a proxyserver—the API server 104, in this example—for the mock server 114 tomimic. The mock service 109 forwards the API request to the web APIservice 108. In reply, the web API service 108 sends a genuine APIresponse to the mock service 109. The mock service 109, in turn, sendsthe genuine API response to the front-end application 111 executing inthe browser 110.

In another example, the response instructions 113 include code for themock service 109 to execute in the process of generating a mock APIresponse to the API request. The code may be written in a compiledprogramming language (e.g., Java or C++) and may be URL-encoded. Thecode may serve a number of different purposes. For example, the code mayinvoke a “sleep” function that causes the mock service 109 to wait for aspecified period of time (e.g., several seconds) before sending the mockAPI response to test how the front-end application 111 handles delayedresponses. In another example, the code may be a function used togenerate the mock API response (e.g., based on current values ofenvironment variables at the mock server 114). In another example, thecode may be used to transform a static value (e.g., provided in a stubin the response instructions 113) or a genuine API response (e.g., fromthe web API service 108) into a specified format to create the mock APIresponse. The mock service 109 then sends the mock API response to thefront-end application 111 in the specified format.

FIG. 2 illustrates a detailed view of the mock service 109, according toone embodiment. As shown, the mock service 109 includes a request parser202, a code interpreter 206, a response generator 208, and a proxycoordinator 210.

When the mock server 114 receives an API request and an associatedcookie for the mock service 109, the request parser 202 identifies andparses response instructions found in the cookie. The responseinstructions dictate how the response generator 208 will go aboutcreating a mock API response to the API request. For example, if theresponse instructions specify a static value, the response generator 208sends the static value in reply to the API request if the responseinstructions so indicate. If the response instructions 113 specify anAPI server to imitate, the response generator 208 signals the proxycoordinator 210 to forward the API request to the API server. The proxycoordinator 210 receives a genuine API response from the API server inresponse to the forwarded API request. The proxy coordinator 210provides the genuine API response to the response generator 208. Theresponse generator 208 can forward the genuine API response in reply tothe API request if the response instructions so indicate.

If the response instructions include code to execute, the responsegenerator 208 uses the code interpreter 206 to execute the code. If thecode is in a compiled language, the code interpreter 206 may be anembeddable source interpreter with object scripting language featuresthat allows the code to be dynamically interpreted. For example, if thecode is written in Java, the code interpreter 206 can be a tool such asBeanShell.

The code, when executed, may perform a number of different tasks for theresponse generator 208. For example, the code may invoke a “sleep”function that causes the response generator 208 to wait several secondsbefore sending a mock API response in reply to the API request. The codemay be a function used to generate the mock API response dynamically.The code may also be used to transform a static value (e.g., provided inthe response instructions) or a genuine API response (e.g., from an APIserver specified in the response instructions) into a specified formatto create the mock API response. The mock service 109 then sends themock API response in the specified format in reply to the API request.

FIG. 3A illustrates a cookie 304A that includes response instructionsincluding a static value to return in a mock API response, according toone embodiment. Stub 302A illustrates the response instructions in anon-URL-encoded format. As shown, stub 302A includes a URL path pattern(“urlPathPattern”) defined by a regular expression(“.*∨access_client∨sign_in.*”). Stub 302A indicates that, in reply to anAPI request matching the URL path pattern, a mock server is to send ahypertext-transfer-protocol (HTTP) status of 500 (“status”: 500) as amock API response (“response”).

Cookie 304A illustrates how the response instructions appear after beingURL-encoded. As shown, the cookie 304A specifies that a variable called“ims-stub” contains the URL-encoded response instructions. Cookie 304Ais sent from a browser along with an API request to a mock server toinform the mock server how to respond to the API request. If the APIrequest the cookie 304A accompanied matches the URL path pattern in thestub 302A, the mock server sends an HTTP status of 500 in reply to theAPI request.

FIG. 3B illustrates a cookie 302B that includes response instructionsspecifying a proxy host to mimic, according to one embodiment. Theresponse instructions indicate that, in reply to an API request thecookie 302B accompanies, a mock server should send the genuine APIresponse that a proxy host (https://accounts.intuit.com, as shown) wouldsend in reply to the API request. Hence, in one embodiment, a mockserver that receives an API request matching the specified path(“path=/”, as shown) and accompanied by cookie 302B forwards the APIrequest to the proxy host, receives the genuine API response from theproxy host, and sends the genuine API response in reply to the APIrequest.

FIG. 3C illustrates a cookie 302C that includes response instructionsspecifying Java code to execute, according to one embodiment. As shown,the response instructions found in the cookie 302C include a line ofJava code (“Thread.sleep(3000);”) for a variable called“ims-transformer.” When a mock server receives an API request matchingthe path pattern (“path=/access_client/sign_in” as shown) accompanied bythe cookie 302C, the mock server executes the line of Java code usingBeanShell. In this example, executing the line of code causes the serverto wait for 3,000 milliseconds (3 seconds).

FIG. 4 illustrates a method 400 for generating a response to an APIrequest at a mock server, according to one embodiment. At step 402, themock server receives an API request and cookies associated with the APIrequest.

At step 404, the mock server parses the cookies to identify responseinstructions included in the cookies. The response instructions mayinclude one or more of: a stub specifying a static response value, aproxy host for the mock server to imitate, or code for the mock serverto execute. For example, in one embodiment, there are three cookiesreceived with the API request: the ims-transformer cookie, the ims-stubcookie, and the ims-proxy-host cookie. In this embodiment, the ims-stubcookie would be used to specify a static response value, theims-proxy-host cookie would be used to specify a proxy host for the mockserver to imitate, and the ims-transformer cookie would be used tospecify code for the mock server to execute.

At step 406, the mock server determines whether the responseinstructions specify a static response value. If so, the method 400proceeds to step 414. If not, the method 400 proceeds to step 408. Ifpresent, the static response value dictates what the mock server willreturn (in step 420). If there is no code to execute (in step 416), thestatic response value may be returned as the API response (in step 420).However, if there is code to execute, the code may transform the staticresponse value into a different format (e.g., from XML to JSON or viceversa).

At step 408, the mock server determines whether the responseinstructions indicate an API server to mimic. If not, the method 400proceeds to step 414. If so, the method 400 proceeds to step 410.

At step 410, the mock server sends the API request to the API server. Atstep 412, the mock server receives a genuine API response from theserver.

At step 414, the mock server determines whether the responseinstructions include code to execute. If so, the mock server executesthe code (step 416). In some examples, the code is written in a compiledlanguage and the mock server executes the code using an embeddablesource interpreter (e.g., BeanShell). The code may include a delayinstruction that causes the mock server to wait a specified period oftime. Alternatively, the code helps determine what will be included in amock API response based on parameters such as environment variables, astatic response value identified in step 406, or a genuine API responsereceived in step 412. In particular, the code may transform the staticresponse value or the genuine API response into a different format. Forexample, if the genuine API response is in in XML format, the code maytransform the response into Javascript Object Notation (JSON) format.

At step 418, the mock server generates a mock API response to the APIrequest based on the response instructions.

At step 420, the mock server sends the mock API response in reply to theAPI request.

FIG. 5 illustrates a method 500 for testing a web application, accordingto one embodiment. At step 502, a user (e.g., a software developer)selects an API request and a desired mock API response (and mock serverbehavior) to test selected functionality of the application. Forexample, the user may choose to test how the application performs when aremote server sends an error message or sends a delayed response.

At step 504, a cookie that includes response instructions for a mockserver to follow in response to the selected API request is created. Forexample, the response instructions may include values for variables themock server uses in generating the mock API response. In one example,the cookie includes a static value for the mock server to return as themock API response, such as an HTTP status code. In another example, thecookie includes a variable specifying a proxy host for the mock serverto mimic. The cookie may also include code for the mock server toexecute before sending a mock API response.

At step 506, a browser executing the front-end code sends the APIrequest and the cookie to a mock server. The mock server follows theresponse instructions contained in the cookie to generate a mock APIresponse and sends the mock API response to the browser.

At step 508, the browser receives the mock API response from the mockserver in reply to the API request. Since the mock server generated themock API response by following the response instructions included in theAPI request, the mock API response is tailored to test the functionalityselected by the user for testing.

At step 510, the user tests functionality of the software applicationusing the mock API response. For example, the user can verify whetherthe software application correctly displays an error message if the mockAPI response includes an HTTP error code. The user can also verify thesoftware application does not crash or behave in some other undesirableway when the mock API response is received. In addition, the user canverify the software application correctly performs any processing stepsthat use the mock API response. Furthermore, if the cookie included codethat caused the mock server to delay sending the mock API response, theuser can verify the application behaves appropriately in light of thedelay.

FIG. 6 illustrates an API mocking system 600 that mocks API serversbased on response instructions included in cookies, according to anembodiment. As shown, the API mocking system 600 includes, withoutlimitation, a central processing unit (CPU) 602, at least one I/O deviceinterface 604 which may allow for the connection of various I/O devices614 (e.g., keyboards, displays, mouse devices, pen input, etc.) to theAPI mocking system 600, network interface 606, a memory 608, storage610, and an interconnect 612.

CPU 602 may retrieve and execute programming instructions stored in thememory 608. Similarly, the CPU 602 may retrieve and store applicationdata residing in the memory 608. The interconnect 612 transmitsprogramming instructions and application data, among the CPU 602, I/Odevice interface 604, network interface 606, memory 608, and storage610. CPU 602 can represent a single CPU, multiple CPUs, a single CPUhaving multiple processing cores, and the like. Additionally, the memory608 represents random access memory. Furthermore, the storage 610 may bea disk drive. Although shown as a single unit, the storage 610 may be acombination of fixed or removable storage devices, such as fixed discdrives, removable memory cards or optical storage, network attachedstorage (NAS), or a storage area-network (SAN).

As shown, memory 608 includes request parser 616, response generator618, and proxy coordinator 620. As shown, storage 610 includes codeinterpreter 622.

When the API mocking system 600 receives an API request and one or morean associated cookies, the request parser 616 parses the one or morecookies to identify response instructions. The response instructionsinform the response generator 618 how to create a mock API response tothe API request. For example, if the response instructions specify astatic value to return as the mock API response, the response generator618 sends the static value in reply to the API request. If the responseinstructions specify an API server to imitate, the response generator618 signals the proxy coordinator 620 to forward the API request to thespecified API server. The proxy coordinator 620 receives a genuine APIresponse from the API server in response to the forwarded API request.The proxy coordinator 620 provides the genuine API response to theresponse generator 618. The response generator 618 sends the genuine APIresponse as the mock API response in reply to the API request if theresponse instructions so indicate.

If the response instructions include code to execute, the responsegenerator 618 uses the code interpreter 622 to execute the code. If thecode is in a compiled language, the code interpreter 622 may be anembeddable source interpreter with object scripting language featuresthat allows the code to be dynamically interpreted. For example, if thecode is written in Java, the code interpreter 622 can be a tool such asBeanShell.

Note, descriptions of embodiments of the present disclosure arepresented above for purposes of illustration, but embodiments of thepresent disclosure are not intended to be limited to any of thedisclosed embodiments. Many modifications and variations will beapparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing fromthe scope and spirit of the described embodiments. The terminology usedherein was chosen to best explain the principles of the embodiments, thepractical application or technical improvement over technologies foundin the marketplace, or to enable others of ordinary skill in the art tounderstand the embodiments disclosed herein.

In the preceding, reference is made to embodiments presented in thisdisclosure. However, the scope of the present disclosure is not limitedto specific described embodiments. Instead, any combination of thefollowing features and elements, whether related to differentembodiments or not, is contemplated to implement and practicecontemplated embodiments. Furthermore, although embodiments disclosedherein may achieve advantages over other possible solutions or over theprior art, whether or not a particular advantage is achieved by a givenembodiment is not limiting of the scope of the present disclosure. Thus,the following aspects, features, embodiments and advantages are merelyillustrative and are not considered elements or limitations of theappended claims except where explicitly recited in a claim(s). Likewise,reference to “the invention” shall not be construed as a generalizationof any inventive subject matter disclosed herein and shall not beconsidered to be an element or limitation of the appended claims exceptwhere explicitly recited in a claim(s).

Aspects of the present disclosure may take the form of an entirelyhardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (includingfirmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodimentcombining software and hardware aspects that may all generally bereferred to herein as a “circuit,” “module,” or “system.” Furthermore,aspects of the present disclosure may take the form of a computerprogram product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s)having computer readable program code embodied thereon.

Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may beutilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signalmedium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readablestorage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic,magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system,apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. Morespecific examples a computer readable storage medium include: anelectrical connection having one or more wires, a hard disk, a randomaccess memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmableread-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portablecompact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, amagnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.In the current context, a computer readable storage medium may be anytangible medium that can contain, or store a program.

While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the presentdisclosure, other and further embodiments of the disclosure may bedevised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scopethereof is determined by the claims that follow.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for providing application programminginterface (API) response instructions for testing an application,comprising: creating, at a client device: response instructionsindicating how a mock server is to respond to an API request; and aresponse value; sending, from the client device to the mock server, theAPI request comprising the response instructions and the response value;receiving, from the mock server at the client device, an API response,wherein: the API response is based on the response; if the responseinstructions in the PI request comprise executable code, the APIresponse comprises a transformed response value generated by executingthe executable code; and if the response instructions in the request donot comprise executable code, the API response comprises the responsevalue; and testing the application with the API response.
 2. The methodof claim 1, wherein: the response instructions in the API requestcomprise executable code; the executable code specifies a proxy serverfor the mock server to mimic, and the executable code is configured tocause the mock server to: forward the API request to the proxy server;receive a genuine API response from the proxy server; and send thegenuine API response as the API response to the client device.
 3. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the executable code is configured to causethe mock server to change the API response from a first format to asecond format prior to sending the API response to the client device. 4.The method of claim 1, wherein the executable code is configured tocause the mock server to wait for a specified amount of time beforesending the API response to the client device.
 5. The method of claim 1,wherein the response instructions are encoded as parameters of a UniformResource Locator (URL).
 6. The method of claim 3, wherein causing theresponse value to be changed from the first format to the second formatcomprises a conversion between eXtensible Markup Language (XML) andJavascript Object Notation (JSON).
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein theAPI response comprises a hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) status.
 8. Asystem, comprising: a memory storing executable instructions; aprocessor configured to execute the executable instructions and causethe system to perform a method for providing application programminginterface (API) response instructions for testing an application, themethod comprising: creating, at a client device: response instructionsindicating how a mock server is to respond to an API request; and aresponse value; sending, from the client device to the mock server, theAPI request comprising the response instructions and the response value;receiving, from the mock server at the client device, an API response,wherein: the API response is based on the response; if the responseinstructions in the API request comprise executable code, the APIresponse comprises a transformed response value generated by executingthe executable code; and if the response instructions in the API requestdo not comprise executable code, the API response comprises the responsevalue; and testing the application with the API response.
 9. The systemof claim 8, wherein: the response instructions in the API requestcomprise executable code; the executable code specifies a proxy serverfor the mock server to mimic, and the executable code is configured tocause the mock server to: forward the API request to the proxy server;receive a genuine API response from the proxy server; and send thegenuine API response as the API response to the system.
 10. The systemof claim 8, wherein the executable code is configured to cause the mockserver to change the API response from a first format to a second formatprior to sending the API response to the system.
 11. The system of claim8, wherein the executable code is configured to cause the mock server towait for a specified amount of time before sending the API response tothe system.
 12. The system of claim 8, wherein the response instructionsare encoded as parameters of a Uniform Resource Locator (URL).
 13. Thesystem of claim 10, wherein causing the response value to be changedfrom the first format to the second format comprises a conversionbetween eXtensible Markup Language (XML) and Javascript Object Notation(JSON).
 14. A method for providing application programming interface(API) response instructions for testing an application, comprising:creating, at a client device, executable code and a response value;sending, from the client device to a mock server, an API requestcomprising the executable code; receiving, from the mock server at theclient device, an API response, wherein the API response comprises atransformed response value generated by executing the executable code;and testing the application with the API response.
 15. The method ofclaim 14, wherein the executable code is configured to cause the mockserver to change the API response from a first format to a second formatprior to sending the API response to the client device.
 16. The methodof claim 14, wherein the executable code is configured to cause the mockserver to wait for a specified amount of time before sending the APIresponse.
 17. The method of claim 14, wherein the API request comprisesa Uniform-Resource-Locator (URL).
 18. The method of claim 14, whereinthe executable code specifies a proxy server for the mock server tomimic, and the executable code is configured to cause the mock serverto: forward the API request to the proxy server; receive a genuine APIresponse from the proxy server; and send the genuine API response as theAPI response to the client device.
 19. The method of claim 14, whereinthe API response comprises a hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) status.20. The method of claim 15, wherein causing the response value to bechanged from the first format to the second format comprises aconversion between eXtensible Markup Language (XML) and JavascriptObject Notation (JSON).